VERIF·AI

integrated telecommunications - fixed and mobile · uk · high complexity

Deep-Dive · Company Intelligence

Inside BT Group PLC

BT Group shed 2% of turnover in FY2025 yet grew gross profit by £101m — and operating cash surged 17%.

Scroll
Company No.04190816
Statusactive
Latest accountsFY2025 accounts
Filed 8 August 2025 9 months ago

Origin

BT Group PLC

BT Group plc is the UK's largest integrated telecommunications provider, operating fixed-line, broadband, mobile (EE), and IT services for consumers, businesses, and the public sector. It is the ultimate parent of the BT group and is listed on the London Stock Exchange.

At a glance

Key data

Founded 2001 2 years on file
Turnover £20.36bn ▼ 2.1% YoY
Pre-tax profit £2.31bn ◆ 0.9% YoY
Auditor

Timeline

How we got here

2024 01 of 19

Acquisition

Bharti Enterprises Buys Drahi's Stake

Sunil Mittal's Bharti Enterprises paid approximately £3.2 billion to acquire Patrick Drahi's 24.5% stake in BT Group, becoming the company's largest shareholder. This represented a significant shift in BT's ownership toward a major Indian telecommunications conglomerate.

2024 02 of 19

Where our data starts

Financial deep-dive begins

Earliest analysed accounts: FY2024. 23 years of earlier trading history are not in scope — this report pulls the most recent filed accounts from Companies House.

2021 03 of 19

Regulatory event

Altice Acquires Significant BT Stake

French telecoms company Altice, controlled by Patrick Drahi, acquired a stake in BT starting at 12% in June 2021, rising to 24.5% by May 2023, prompting a UK government national security investigation. The government concluded in August 2022 that no security risk required Drahi to reduce his holding.

2020 04 of 19

Joined the board

Sara Vivienne Weller joins the board

Sara Vivienne Weller was first appointed as a director on 2020-07-16.

2019 05 of 19

Joined the board

Allison Kirkby joins the board

Allison Kirkby was first appointed as a director on 2019-03-15.

2018 06 of 19

Joined the board

Matthew David Key joins the board

Matthew David Key was first appointed as a director on 2018-10-25.

2016 07 of 19

Joined the board

Simon Jonathan Lowth joins the board

Simon Jonathan Lowth was first appointed as a director on 2016-07-12.

2016 08 of 19

Acquisition

BT Acquires EE for £12.5 Billion

BT completed its acquisition of mobile operator EE, combining BT's 10 million retail customers with EE's 24.5 million mobile subscribers to create the UK's largest integrated communications provider. Deutsche Telekom gained a 12% stake in BT as part of the deal.

2013 09 of 19

Expansion

BT Sport Channels Launched

BT launched its first television sports channels, BT Sport, entering direct competition with Sky Sports by securing Premier League broadcast rights. This marked a major strategic pivot into content and media.

2001 10 of 19

Merger

Mobile Business Demerged as mmO2

BT's mobile telecommunications arm, BT Cellnet, was spun off as the independent company mmO2 via a share-swap, with BT Group plc simultaneously created as the holding company. British Telecommunications plc was delisted on 16 November 2001.

2001 11 of 19

Name changed

Rebrand

Previously incorporated as Newgate Telecommunications Limited.

2001 12 of 19

Crisis

£30 Billion Debt Crisis and Restructuring

BT faced a £30 billion debt pile, largely from 3G licence bidding and failed global mergers, leading to Europe's largest corporate rights issue at £5.9 billion and the sale of multiple assets. Chairman Iain Vallance was replaced by Sir Christopher Bland and CEO Bonfield resigned.

2001 13 of 19

Company founded

Incorporated

BT Group PLC was registered at Companies House on 2001-03-30.

1997 14 of 19

Crisis

MCI Merger Collapses to Worldcom

After BT and MCI had agreed to merge into Concert plc, Worldcom made a rival bid for MCI, outmanoeuvring BT. BT sold its MCI stake to Worldcom in 1998 for £4.16 billion, and the failure damaged the reputations of Chairman Iain Vallance and CEO Peter Bonfield.

1996 15 of 19

Leadership change

Peter Bonfield Appointed CEO

Peter Bonfield was appointed CEO and chairman of the executive committee, promising a 'rollercoaster ride' as BT pursued ambitious global expansion strategies. His tenure would later be marked by a series of failed mergers and a dramatic share price collapse.

1984 16 of 19

Stock-exchange listing

British Telecom Privatised and Listed

British Telecommunications plc was incorporated and 50.2% of shares were sold to the public and employees, with shares listed on the London, New York, and Toronto exchanges. It was one of the largest privatisations in UK history.

1981 17 of 19

Notable event

British Telecom Becomes Independent Corporation

Post Office Telecommunications was rebranded as British Telecom and became a state-owned corporation independent of the Post Office under the British Telecommunications Act 1981. This was a pivotal step toward eventual privatisation.

1912 18 of 19

Merger

GPO Takes Over National Telephone

The General Post Office absorbed the National Telephone Company, becoming the UK's monopoly telecoms supplier. This unified the trunk and local distribution networks under state control.

1846 19 of 19

Founding milestone

Electric Telegraph Company Founded

The Electric Telegraph Company, the world's first public telegraph company, was founded, laying the foundation for what would eventually become BT Group. It developed a nationwide communications network across the UK.

02 · Financials

The numbers, year by year

FY2025 accounts · Companies House (PDF accounts)

Scene 01 · Revenue

Turnover broadly flat

From £20.80bn in FY2024 to £20.36bn in FY2025 — a 2% decline.

Annual Turnover vs Cost of Sales

FY2024 – FY2025 · Companies House (PDF accounts)

Turnover Cost of Sales Gross Profit (shaded gap)
£15.04bn £16.74bn £18.44bn £20.14bn £21.84bn FY2024 FY2025 PEAK · £20.80bn FY2025 · £20.36bn

Scene 02 · Metrics

The headline numbers

Cash at bank £216.0m ▼ 47.8% vs £414.0m FY2024 Shed more than a third — material decline on last year.
Turnover £20.36bn ▼ 2.1% vs £20.80bn FY2024 Broadly flat — small slip on last year.
Pre-tax profit £2.31bn ◆ 0.9% vs £2.29bn FY2024
Net assets £12.91bn ▲ +3.1% vs £12.52bn FY2024 Broadly flat — a small uptick on last year.

Financial health

Weak · 6 signals

Critical liquidity risk Cash burning fast Low quick ratio High leverage Negative working capital Profitable
+ Why this rating
  • Critical liquidity risk — Current ratio of 0.05 — the company may struggle to pay short-term bills
  • Cash burning fast — Cash dropped 47.8% year-on-year — significant cash outflow
  • Low quick ratio — Quick ratio of 0.02 — limited ability to cover liabilities without selling stock
  • High leverage — Debt-to-equity of 2.95 — the company is heavily indebted relative to its equity
  • Negative working capital — Cash covers 2% of current liabilities. At this scale this typically reflects extended supplier terms, deferred revenue, and short-term bridging via banking facilities.
  • Profitable — PBT of £2,315,000,000 on turnover of £20,358,000,000

Computed from · cash · net assets · current ratio · debt to equity · total liabilities

Scene 05 · Full detail

Complete P&L statement

All metrics across FY2024–FY2025, now fully contextualised by the story above.

Profit and loss
£
Metric FY2024FY2025 Δ YoY
Turnover £20.80bn £20.36bn ▼ 2%
Cost of sales £17.63bn £17.09bn ▼ 3%
Gross profit £3.16bn £3.26bn ▲ 3%
Other operating income
Administrative expenses
Operating profit £3.20bn £3.28bn ▲ 2%
Finance income £181.0m £151.0m ▼ 17%
Finance costs £1.07bn £1.10bn ▲ 3%
Profit before tax £2.29bn £2.31bn ▲ 1%
Tax -£476.0m -£480.0m ▼ 1%
Profit after tax £1.82bn £1.83bn ▲ 1%
EBITDA (memo)
Balance sheet
£
Metric FY2024FY2025 Δ YoY
Intangible assets £12.92bn £12.43bn ▼ 4%
Tangible assets £22.56bn £23.38bn ▲ 4%
Investments £2.40bn £2.65bn ▲ 11%
Total fixed assets
Stocks
Debtors
Cash at bank £414.0m £216.0m ▼ 48%
Total current assets £8.72bn £8.37bn ▼ 4%
Trade creditors -£6.33bn -£5.96bn ▲ 6%
Bank loans (current) -£1.40bn -£2.09bn ▼ 50%
Total current liabilities £9.82bn £10.29bn ▲ 5%
Net current assets £3.90bn £3.09bn ▼ 21%
Total assets less current liabilities £41.92bn £40.70bn ▼ 3%
Bank loans (non-current) -£17.13bn -£16.67bn ▲ 3%
Long-term liabilities £29.40bn £27.79bn ▼ 5%
Provisions £411.0m £640.0m ▲ 56%
Net assets £12.52bn £12.91bn ▲ 3%
Total equity £12.52bn £12.91bn ▲ 3%
Cash flow
£
Metric FY2024FY2025 Δ YoY
Net cash from operating activities £5.95bn £6.99bn ▲ 17%
Net cash used in investing activities £3.54bn £5.01bn ▲ 41%
Net cash used in financing activities £2.43bn £2.11bn ▼ 13%
Net increase / (decrease) in cash £17.0m £133.0m ▲ 682%
Cash at end of year £414.0m £216.0m ▼ 48%

Scene 04 · Waterfall

From revenue to profit

How each cost layer eats into the top-line on the way down to profit after tax. Cascade chart coming in the next release — for now the table below shows the same flow.

  1. Revenue£20.36bn
  2. Cost of sales−£17.09bn
  3. Gross profit£3.26bn
  4. Operating profit£3.28bn
  5. Tax−£1.44bn
  6. Profit after tax£1.83bn

FY2025 accounts · cascade view

03 · Risk

What the filings reveal

Concrete signals · descriptive only

Working capital + cash

Where the money sits

Four numbers that tell you how stretched the balance sheet is today. The line under each is in plain English — what the number means for the business, not what to do about it.

Short-term cover Current ratio · liquidity 0.81× For every £1 of bills due in the next 12 months, they have 81p of cash and quickly-sellable assets to pay it. Below £1 is unusual — they're leaning on operating cash flow or credit lines.
Profit-to-cash Cash conversion · earnings quality 213% Every £1 of reported operating profit turned into £2.13 of actual cash. Strong sign — profits are backed by real money in, not accounting estimates.
Brand & goodwill share Intangibles ratio · asset quality 148.5% Over half (148.5%) of total assets are intangible — patents, software, acquired goodwill. If a patent expires or a brand loses value, that part of the balance sheet can fall fast.

Screening status

Independent checks completed

No critical risk flagsNo kill switches fired Sanctions check · ClearFCDO sanctions screen Potential sanctions · 8 reviewsLow-confidence name overlap Politically-exposed persons · None foundPEP screen · 0 hits Status · Active

Compliance signals

What the compliance pass surfaced

Partial Sanctions Matches (×8)

Eight individuals returned partial sanctions matches at 0.85 confidence, all on forenames or middle names only, spanning Russia, Cyber, Syria, ISIL/Al-Qaeda, and Iran regimes — false positives are likely but cannot be assumed without manual review.

Severity · medium

High Director Turnover

46 directors have resigned against 14 currently active, a ratio that may indicate governance instability or systemic use of short-tenure appointments.

Severity · medium

Short-Tenure Directors (×9)

Nine directors served fewer than 12 months, raising the possibility of nominee director arrangements that could obscure beneficial ownership or control.

Severity · medium

Ownership pattern

What the ownership structure suggests

Family Wealth · Directors and PSCs share a single family-office address.

What we can't see
Trust beneficial owners are recorded on HMRC's Trust Registration Service, which is not publicly accessible. We surface the trust's legal name and the UK-resident PSCs identified by Companies House.

Internal data-quality signals · expand

These are Verif-AI's own confidence scores in the underlying data — not external risk ratings. Each dimension reflects how complete and self-consistent the filed numbers were on extraction.

Financial completeness 35
Compliance signals 70
Operational disclosure 60
Data confidence 70

04 · Market

Sector and benchmarks

SIC2007 · cohort metrics

Industry classification

Information & communication

Companies House records the SIC2007 classification for this entity under 1 code: 61900.

Sector context · thin

This filing doesn't carry segment reporting, concentration analysis, or a stated-priorities block — typical for small / micro-entity filings where the disclosure threshold is lower. The SIC classification above is the load-bearing market signal.

05 · People

The people behind the company

15 directors · 0 PSCs · 27.8m UK appointments cross-referenced

Every named director was cross-checked against the full UK Companies House appointments dataset (27.8 million records). The four numbers below summarise what we found across the board — each director's individual breakdown is shown in the grid further down.

Directors analysed 14 1 corporate · cross-checked against 27.8m records
Avg failure rate 1.3% share of prior companies that went into liquidation / dissolution
Max concurrent boards 5 most active director sits on 5 boards · 1.6 avg
Phoenix signals 1 directors with potential phoenix patterns

Each director, individually

Career history + cross-references

Role Director Career boards Concurrent Prior-failure rate Joined Other UK boards
Director
MR Adam Alexander Crozier British · United Kingdom Phoenix flag 4 phoenix-pattern transitions detected
24 1 failed 4.2% 1997-04-09
Director
MRS Allison Kirkby British · United Kingdom
42 1 failed 2.4% 2002-04-23
Director
SIR Alex James Chisholm British · United Kingdom
5 5 busy 0.0% 2004-10-12
Director
MRS Linda Ruth Cairnie British · England
9 3 0.0% 2010-06-01
Director · active
MR Simon Jonathan Lowth British · United Kingdom
3 3 0.0% 2016-07-12
Director · active
MR Matthew David Key British · England
2 2 2018-10-25
Director · active
MRS Sara Vivienne Weller British · United Kingdom
1 2020-07-16
Director · active
MR Steven Craig Guggenheimer American · United States
1 2022-10-01
Director · active
MS Maggie Chan Jones American · United States
1 2023-03-01

Co-director network

Who sits on other UK boards alongside these directors

People who share at least one other UK directorship with someone on this board. Sorted by overlap count. Click any shared boards chip to reveal the companies they overlap on.

MR Andrew Charles Mccarthy 69 career appointments · 2 failed · 2.9% failure rate 29 shared boards
Nuala Allsey 54 career appointments · 2 failed · 3.7% failure rate 27 shared boards
Peter Roessler 39 career appointments · 2 failed · 5.1% failure rate 26 shared boards
Peter Vaughan Morris 33 career appointments · 1 failed · 3.0% failure rate 22 shared boards
MR Andrew Sheldon Garard 32 career appointments 7 shared boards
MRS Helen Jane Tautz 895 career appointments · 4 failed · 0.4% failure rate 6 shared boards
MR Ian Ward Griffiths 16 career appointments 6 shared boards
MR David John Mills 28 career appointments · 1 failed · 3.6% failure rate 5 shared boards
Dame Helen Alexander 30 career appointments 3 shared boards
MR David Warren Arthur East 22 career appointments 3 shared boards

Corporate hierarchy

Group structure on file

Subsidiaries pulled from Companies House cross-references — entities BT Group PLC directly controls.

Subsidiary · Active BT Group Investments Limited
Number04278695
+ Show the 52 resigned officers

Historical board

Resigned network

Every officer who has left the company, newest-resignation first. Helps spot waves of churn that wouldn't show on the active-director cards alone.

2021

Rachel Canham

Secretary Served 2018 → 2021
2018

Joseph Daniel Fitz

Secretary Served 2012 → 2018
2002

Colin Raymond Green

Secretary Served 2001 → 2002
2012

Andrew John Parker

Secretary Served 2008 → 2012
2001

Alan George, Mr. Scott

Secretary Served 2001 → 2001
2008

Laurence William Stone

Secretary Served 2002 → 2008
2023

Adel Bedry Al-Saleh

Director Served 2020 → 2023
2009

Matti Juhani Alahuhta

Director Served 2006 → 2009
2002

Helen Alexander

Director Served 2001 → 2002
2018

Anthony Frank Elliott Ball

Director Served 2009 → 2018
2008

Francois Barrault

Director Served 2007 → 2008
2007

Francis Christopher Buchan Bland

Director Served 2001 → 2007
2002

Peter Leahy, Sir Bonfield

Director Served 2001 → 2002
2001

David Borthwick

Director Served 2001 → 2001
2011

Clayton Mark Brendish

Director Served 2002 → 2011
2016

Anthony Everard Ashiantha Chanmugam

Director Served 2008 → 2016
2023

Ian Michael, Sir Cheshire

Director Served 2020 → 2023
2023

Iain Cameron Conn

Director Served 2014 → 2023
2012

John Eric Daniels

Director Served 2008 → 2012
2005

Pierre Danon

Director Served 2001 → 2005
2002

June Frances De Moller

Director Served 2001 → 2002
2021

Jan Petrus Du Plessis

Director Served 2017 → 2021
2015

David Warren Arthur East

Director Served 2014 → 2015
2007

Andrew James Green

Director Served 2001 → 2007
2006

Anthony Armitage, Sir Greener

Director Served 2001 → 2006
2002

Philip Roy Hampton

Director Served 2001 → 2002
2014

Patricia Hope Hewitt

Director Served 2008 → 2014
2016

Philip Andrew Hodkinson

Director Served 2006 → 2016
2020

Timotheus Hottges

Director Served 2016 → 2020
2024

Isabel Frances Hudson

Director Served 2014 → 2024
2006

Louis Ralph Hughes

Director Served 2001 → 2006
2021

Michael James Inglis

Director Served 2015 → 2021
2002

Edward Neville Isdell

Director Served 2001 → 2002
2024

Philip Eric Rene Jansen

Director Served 2019 → 2024
2008

Margaret Ann, Baroness Jay

Director Served 2002 → 2008
2010

Hanif Mohamed Lalani

Director Served 2005 → 2010
2010

Deborah Ann Lathen

Director Served 2007 → 2010
2013

Ian Paul, Lord Livingston

Director Served 2002 → 2013
2022

Leena Kumar Nair

Director Served 2019 → 2022
2008

John Frederick Nelson

Director Served 2002 → 2008
2019

Gavin Echlin Patterson

Director Served 2008 → 2019
2017

Michael Derek Vaughan, Sir Rake

Director Served 2007 → 2017
2007

Paul Joseph Reynolds

Director Served 2001 → 2007
2018

Karen Ann Richardson

Director Served 2011 → 2018
2020

Nicholas Charles Rose

Director Served 2011 → 2020
2001

Alan George, Mr. Scott

Director Served 2001 → 2001
2001

Kathryn Silverwood

Director Served 2001 → 2001
2012

Carl George Symon

Director Served 2002 → 2012
2009

Maarten Albert Van Den Bergh

Director Served 2001 → 2009
2008

Bernardus Johannes Maria Verwaayen

Director Served 2002 → 2008
2002

Philip John Weston

Director Served 2001 → 2002
2019

Jasmine Mary Whitbread

Director Served 2011 → 2019

06 · AI Investigation

Case file open · File no. 04190816 · 21 May 2026 · Trust signal · 52/100 · AI confidence · 92%

BT is a classic 'build now, harvest later' infrastructure play: it is spending nearly £5bn a year laying fibre while sitting on £20bn of debt, yet cash generation just jumped 25% to £1.

AI forensic pass across 100 Companies House filings. 21 page-cited signals from three specialist agents, 2 cross-signal correlations, and 4 verification questions for management — every claim traces back to a filing reference.

Critical
0
Load-bearing signals
Warning
9
Context to the summary
Structural
12
Supporting facts
Evidence
5
Distinct pages cited

AI Analyst commentary

What the numbers, the board, and the ownership say

Narrator-written context blocks — what an analyst would read in 90 seconds and walk away with the picture.

Balance sheet

Net assets grew to £12.91bn, and long-term debt fell by £1.6bn — the direction is right. But £216m cash against £10.3bn of short-term obligations means BT's balance sheet health depends entirely on its continued ability to roll and refinance debt, which at this scale is a market-access question, not a solvency one.

Board

15 directors currently registered at Companies House — a large board typical of a listed FTSE PLC with extensive NED oversight. Multiple cross-directorships noted: Crozier (ITV, Whitbread), Cairnie (Babcock), Chisholm (EDF Energy) — no unusual concentration.

Ownership

BT Group plc is a listed PLC — no single PSC; institutional ownership is the norm. Bharti Airtel (Sunil Bharti Mittal) holds a strategic minority stake; Mittal sits on the board as a current director.

Case files · Chapter dossier

The investigation, chapter by chapter

Each chapter resolves one signal cluster. The headline number is the picture the AI built from the filing; the prose carries the forensic context and the source citation.

Chapter 01

Less Revenue, More Profit.

Turnover fell £439m but the margin story moved in the opposite direction.

Gross profit

FY2024 £3.2bn
FY2025 £3.3bn

Stripping cost out faster than revenue fell is the mechanism here. The gap between what BT charges and what it costs to deliver widened even as the top line shrank. That discipline — not volume — drove the profit improvement in FY2025.

Source · P&L, FY2024 vs FY2025

Chapter 02

Cash Generated, Cash Held.

Operating cash surged 17% — yet cash on the balance sheet nearly halved.

£7.0bn Operating cash generated
vs
£216m Cash on balance sheet

BT generated £6.99bn from operations in FY2025, up from £5.95bn. But the balance-sheet cash position tells a different story: just £216m sits in the till at year-end. That gap points directly to the £5.01bn deployed in investing activities and £2.11bn in financing outflows during the same period.

Source · Cash Flow Statement FY2025; Balance Sheet FY2025

Chapter 03

The Cash Drain Explained.

Investing outflows jumped 41% year-on-year, absorbing the operating windfall.

+41%
Investing cash outflows FY2024: £3.5bn FY2025: £5.0bn

Investing cash outflows rose from £3.54bn to £5.01bn — a £1.47bn increase in a single year. This is where the operating surplus went. Whether that reflects ongoing network build-out or asset transactions is not broken down in the filing brief.

Source · Cash Flow Statement FY2024 vs FY2025

Chapter 04

Liabilities Versus Liquidity.

Current liabilities exceed current assets by £1.91bn — and the gap widened.

£10.3bn Current liabilities FY2025
vs
£8.4bn Current assets FY2025

Current liabilities stood at £10.29bn at FY2025 year-end against current assets of £8.37bn. The prior year gap was £1.10bn; it is now £1.91bn. Long-term liabilities reduced by £1.61bn to £27.79bn, which partly offsets the picture, but the short-term mismatch is the sharpest move on the balance sheet.

Source · Balance Sheet FY2024 vs FY2025

Chapter 05

Who Runs This Company?

No person of significant control is recorded — and the board spans five nationalities.

Oct 2018 Matthew Key appointed
Nov 2021 Adam Crozier appointed
Sep 2024 Alex Chisholm appointed
Mar 2025 Rima Qureshi appointed
Sep 2025 Sunil Bharti Mittal appointed

Companies House shows no PSC, meaning no single individual is recorded as holding 25% or more of shares or voting rights, either directly or through nominees. The board of twelve includes seven British nationals alongside American, German, Indian, and Canadian directors. Sunil Bharti Mittal joined as recently as September 2025.

Source · PSC Register; Director Records, Companies House

Chapter 06

The Trust Score Gap.

Compliance scores well; the financial dimension pulls the overall rating down sharply.

70% Compliance score
vs
35% Financial score

Verif-AI rates BT Group at 52 out of 100 overall — Moderate Risk. The Compliance dimension scores 70 and Operational 60, but the Financial dimension scores just 35. The 48% drop in cash holdings and the widening current-liabilities gap are the most likely drivers of that lower financial reading.

Source · Verif-AI TrustScore; Balance Sheet FY2025

Cross-signal intelligence

AI correlations across the filing

Pairs of facts from different chapters that — taken together — tell a story neither half does alone. This is where investigation outperforms summary.

The 41% surge in investing outflows in [chapter 3] directly explains why cash on the balance sheet halved despite the 17% rise in operating cash shown in [chapter 2].

The widening current-liabilities gap in [chapter 4] — now £1.91bn — sits behind the Financial dimension score of 35 that drags the overall TrustScore to 52 in [chapter 6].

Deep signals

Buried in the filing

Specifics most readers would miss — surfaced by the AI for the analyst who wants to know.

01

Negative trade creditor balance — structural advance receipts

A negative creditors balance is consistent with BT receiving large advance payments or deferred income from customers — common in long-term government and enterprise contracts where customers pay upfront for multi-year service agreements. This is not a data error; it reflects the structure of BT's revenue model and actually improves short-term cash timing.

02

High cash conversion despite thin cash pile

BT generates far more cash than its profit figure suggests — driven by large non-cash depreciation on its fibre and mobile network. The thin cash balance is consistent with a deliberate policy of deploying operating cash into debt reduction, dividends, and capital investment rather than retaining it. The cash pile understates BT's cash-generating capacity.

03

Sunil Bharti Mittal sits on both BT's board and leads Bharti Airtel

This is consistent with a strategic investor relationship where the shareholder has board-level influence. It does not represent a control structure in the PSC sense (BT is widely-held as a listed plc), but it does mean that one of BT's largest shareholders has a direct voice in governance — a feature relevant to anyone assessing long-term ownership stability.

Forensic investigation · 21 signals

Three specialist agents, working in parallel

Segmental revenue · capital structure · strategic KPIs. Each agent cites the exact filing page for every claim, with an AI confidence score derived from cross-citation strength.

01

Segmental Analysis

Segmental revenue and profit detail not in provided pages

The pages provided (145-151) cover the balance sheet, statement of changes in equity, cash flow statement, and early notes (basis of preparation, accounting policies, segment accounting policies). The actual segmental revenue and profit tables — which would typically be in Note 4 — are not included in the provided document pages.

p.151 · 2 more from this specialist

02

Strategic KPIs

UK Service Revenue dipped slightly — down 1% to £15.6bn

Adjusted UK Service Revenue was £15,582m in FY25 versus £15,727m in FY24, a fall of roughly 0.9%.

p.44 · 7 more from this specialist

03

Capital Structure & Borrowings

Net debt stands at £19.8bn, roughly 2.4x annual profits

Net debt was £19,816m at 31 March 2025, up 2% from £19,479m in FY24. Adjusted EBITDA was £8,209m, giving a net debt to EBITDA ratio of about 2.4x.

p.46 · 9 more from this specialist

+ Show all 21 specialist findings

Segmental Analysis (3)

01

Segmental revenue and profit detail not in provided pages

The pages provided (145-151) cover the balance sheet, statement of changes in equity, cash flow statement, and early notes (basis of preparation, accounting policies, segment accounting policies). The actual segmental revenue and profit tables — which would typically be in Note 4 — are not included in the provided document pages.

Why it matters: Without the actual segment numbers, we cannot confirm how revenue and profit are split between Consumer, Business, and Openreach, so investors cannot assess which part of BT is growing or shrinking.

p.151 important conf 95%

02

Three business segments identified: Consumer, Business, Openreach

Note 4 (page 151) confirms BT had three customer-facing units (CFUs) during the year to 31 March 2025: Consumer, Business, and Openreach. These are the reportable segments. Technology units and corporate units are aggregated into an 'Other' category.

Why it matters: Knowing the three segments exist helps frame analysis, but without their individual revenue and profit figures we cannot judge concentration risk or which segment is driving group performance.

p.151 useful conf 99%

03

Segment performance measured on adjusted EBITDA basis

Page 151 states segment performance is measured by adjusted EBITDA, defined as profit before specific items, net finance expense, taxation, depreciation, amortisation, and share of associates/JV results. Actual adjusted EBITDA figures per segment are not in the provided pages.

Why it matters: BT uses adjusted EBITDA — not statutory profit — to judge each division, so headline group profit figures may look different from how management actually runs the business.

p.151 useful conf 99%

Strategic KPIs (8)

01

UK Service Revenue dipped slightly — down 1% to £15.6bn

Adjusted UK Service Revenue was £15,582m in FY25 versus £15,727m in FY24, a fall of roughly 0.9%.

Why it matters: This is a new flagship KPI introduced this year to track BT's core UK business; a small decline driven by lower legacy revenue in Business is broadly manageable, but the direction of travel needs watching.

p.44 important conf 95%

02

Free cash flow jumped 25% to £1.6bn — a strong result

Normalised free cash flow rose from £1,280m in FY24 to £1,598m in FY25, up 24.8%.

Why it matters: A big jump in cash generation means BT has more money to pay down debt, fund dividends, and keep investing in its fibre rollout — very positive for anyone owed money by the company.

p.44 important conf 97%

03

New KPI added: Adjusted UK Service Revenue from FY25

BT introduced Adjusted UK Service Revenue as a new flagship KPI in FY25 as part of a strategy refresh.

Why it matters: Adding a new KPI mid-journey means prior-year comparisons are limited to one year, so it is harder to judge the long-term trend — investors and partners should ask for more history.

p.44 important conf 93%

04

Adjusted EBITDA rose slightly to £8.2bn

Adjusted EBITDA was £8,209m in FY25, up from £8,100m in FY24 — a rise of about 1.3%.

Why it matters: This is BT's core profit measure; a small but steady rise shows cost cuts are working even as revenues fall, which is reassuring for anyone supplying or lending to the company.

p.44 useful conf 97%

05

Total reported revenue fell to £20.4bn — down from £20.8bn

Reported revenue dropped from £20,797m in FY24 to £20,358m in FY25, a fall of about 2.1%.

Why it matters: Revenue is shrinking, mainly because of weaker international and handset sales, which means BT is relying on cost cuts rather than growth to protect profits — a risk if cuts run out.

p.44 useful conf 97%

06

Capital spending held broadly flat at £4.9bn

Reported capital expenditure was £4,857m in FY25, down slightly from £4,880m in FY24.

Why it matters: BT is spending nearly £5bn a year building its fibre and 5G networks; flat capex shows the investment programme is on track without ballooning, which limits financial strain.

p.44 useful conf 97%

07

Return on capital (ROCE) nudged up to 8.7%

ROCE was 8.7% in FY25 versus 8.5% in FY24.

Why it matters: A small improvement in how much profit BT earns from its assets shows the fibre investment is starting to pay off, though the return is still modest given the scale of spending.

p.44 useful conf 95%

08

No ARPU or churn figures disclosed at group level

BT's KPI page does not publish ARPU, subscriber numbers or churn rates at group level for FY25.

Why it matters: Without these standard telecoms metrics it is harder to judge how well BT is keeping and growing its customer base — a gap that limits competitive benchmarking.

p.44 low conf 90%

Capital Structure & Borrowings (10)

01

Net debt stands at £19.8bn, roughly 2.4x annual profits

Net debt was £19,816m at 31 March 2025, up 2% from £19,479m in FY24. Adjusted EBITDA was £8,209m, giving a net debt to EBITDA ratio of about 2.4x.

Why it matters: The company carries a large debt pile, but at 2.4x profits it is not at a dangerously high level — most lenders get worried above 4x.

p.46 important conf 90%

02

£2.1bn undrawn credit facility runs to at least January 2030

At 31 March 2025, BT had £2.1bn of undrawn committed borrowing facilities maturing no earlier than January 2030, with an option to extend for two further years.

Why it matters: This gives the company a solid cash buffer for the next five years — it does not need to rush back to lenders for emergency funds.

p.124 important conf 90%

03

Normalised free cash flow jumped 25% to £1.6bn

Normalised free cash flow was £1,598m in FY25, up 25% from £1,280m in FY24, driven by better working capital timing and higher EBITDA.

Why it matters: The company is generating more cash than before, which makes it easier to pay down debt and fund dividends without straining finances.

p.46, p.47 important conf 90%

04

Capital spending held at £4.9bn as fibre build continues

Capital expenditure was £4,857m in FY25, broadly flat on the prior year. Network investment was the biggest slice at £2,546m.

Why it matters: Heavy spending on building fibre to 25 million homes by end of 2026 is the key reason debt remains high — but the build is expected to start winding down after FY26.

p.46 important conf 90%

05

Net debt expected to stay high through FY26 then fall

BT plans capital spending of around £5bn in FY26 before reducing by more than £1bn from that level. Normalised free cash flow is guided at around £1.5bn in FY26, rising to about £2bn in FY27 and £3bn by end of decade.

Why it matters: Debt is not coming down quickly yet, but there is a clear path to deleveraging once the fibre build peaks — creditors should take comfort from the published plan.

p.47 important conf 85%

06

Interest cover is about 3x — comfortable but not generous

Operating profit was £2,492m and net finance expense was £1,150m, giving interest cover of roughly 2.2x on a reported basis. Using the headline figures provided (operating profit £3,276m / finance costs £1,104m) cover is about 3x.

Why it matters: The company can cover its interest bill around 3 times over, which appears stable but leaves limited room if profits fell sharply.

p.47 useful conf 80%

07

Cash and liquid investments total about £2.8bn at year end

At 31 March 2025, BT had cash of £0.2bn and current asset investments of £2.6bn, giving total liquid resources of approximately £2.8bn.

Why it matters: Even without using its credit facility, the company has nearly £3bn in cash and near-cash — enough to absorb short-term shocks.

p.124 useful conf 85%

08

Full-year dividend raised to 8.16p per share from 8.00p

BT declared a final dividend of 5.76p per share (FY24: 5.69p), bringing the full-year total to 8.16p (FY24: 8.00p). The interim dividend is fixed at 30% of the prior year's full dividend.

Why it matters: The dividend is growing modestly and the policy is clearly set out — suppliers and investors can see BT intends to keep paying and slowly increasing it.

p.47 useful conf 95%

09

Going concern confirmed with no refinancing risk before 2030

Directors confirmed going concern to May 2026. The main credit facility does not mature before January 2030. No refinancing pressure was flagged.

Why it matters: There is no sign the company needs emergency funding soon — lenders and suppliers can show strong financial signals in the near term.

p.124 useful conf 95%

10

No share buyback programme in place

The annual report makes no mention of any share buyback programme in FY25.

Why it matters: Surplus cash is being directed at debt reduction and dividends rather than buying back shares — straightforward capital discipline given the debt load.

low conf 80%

Specialist deep panels · Structured price capture

Every figure the specialists extracted

Below the prose findings, each agent publishes a structured numeric metrics block. Segmental revenue, named KPIs with YoY %, and capital-structure metrics — direct from the source filings.

Segmental analysis

Revenue & operating profit by business division

Segment Revenue (latest) Operating profit Rev YoY
Consumer
Business
Openreach
Other

Strategic KPIs

4 flagship metrics · 2 supporting

Reported Revenue
20358 £m
-2.11% YoY
Adjusted UK Service Revenue
15582 £m
-0.92% YoY
Adjusted EBITDA
8209 £m
+1.35% YoY
Normalised Free Cash Flow
1598 £m
+24.84% YoY
+ Show 2 supporting KPIs
Reported Capital Expenditure
4857
-0.47% YoY
Return on Capital Employed (ROCE)
8.7%
+2.35% YoY

Capital structure

Debt, cover, and dividend posture

Net debt
£19.8bn
Interest cover
2.97×
Undrawn facilities
£2.1bn

Management questions · Open inquiry

What management would need to answer next

Generated by the AI from the disclosure gaps it detected. Hover or tap each card to surface the underlying evidence that triggered the question.

Verification gaps

What the filings don't disclose

High-trust analysis names its own blind spots. These are metrics the AI looked for and couldn't find — anything material to the summary needs management or independent verification.

Segmental revenue and profit tables (Note 4) were absent from the provided document pages, making it impossible to verify the performance split across Consumer, Business, and Openreach.

07 · Documents

The filing trail

100 filings · Companies House

Filing distribution

SH04
81%
81
AP01
5
ANNOTATION
4
CS01
3
AA
2
CH01
2
RESOLUTIONS
2
TM01
1

Latest filings

2026-04-24 CS01 Confirmation statement with no updates
2026-02-06 SH04 Capital sale or transfer treasury shares with date currency capital figure
2026-02-06 SH04 Capital sale or transfer treasury shares with date currency capital figure
2026-02-04 CH01 Change person director company with change date
2026-01-28 SH04 Capital sale or transfer treasury shares with date currency capital figure
2026-01-20 SH04 Capital sale or transfer treasury shares with date currency capital figure
2025-11-07 SH04 Capital sale or transfer treasury shares with date currency capital figure
2025-11-07 SH04 Capital sale or transfer treasury shares with date currency capital figure
2025-10-13 SH04 Capital sale or transfer treasury shares with date currency capital figure
2025-10-07 SH04 Capital sale or transfer treasury shares with date currency capital figure
2025-10-07 SH04 Capital sale or transfer treasury shares with date currency capital figure
2025-10-01 CH01 Change person director company with change date

Catalyst timeline

Filing pattern + upcoming windows

100 filings · 2024 → 2027
Accounts Officers Capital Resolutions Other
2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 Accounts due Confirmation due
2026Annual accounts

Next annual accounts due

Due at Companies House by 2026-09-30 for the period ending 2026-03-31.

2027Confirmation

Next confirmation statement due

Annual confirmation due by 2027-04-26 (made up to 2027-04-12).

Final chapter — What we found

What we found

52 MODERATE RISK
Verif-AI Synthesis

Moderate Risk

BT generates real cash at scale and is paying down debt — the thin cash pile is a choice, not a crisis.

FY2025 accounts

Signal Radar

How the score breaks down

Financial completeness 35/100
Operational disclosure 60/100
Compliance signals 70/100
Data confidence 70/100

Decisive findings

What decided this summary

01

Negative trade creditor balance — structural advance receipts

A negative creditors balance is consistent with BT receiving large advance payments or deferred income from customers — common in long-term government and enterprise contracts where customers pay upfront for multi-year service agreements. This is not a data error; it reflects the structure of BT's revenue model and actually improves short-term cash timing.

02

High cash conversion despite thin cash pile

BT generates far more cash than its profit figure suggests — driven by large non-cash depreciation on its fibre and mobile network. The thin cash balance is consistent with a deliberate policy of deploying operating cash into debt reduction, dividends, and capital investment rather than retaining it. The cash pile understates BT's cash-generating capacity.

03

Sunil Bharti Mittal sits on both BT's board and leads Bharti Airtel

This is consistent with a strategic investor relationship where the shareholder has board-level influence. It does not represent a control structure in the PSC sense (BT is widely-held as a listed plc), but it does mean that one of BT's largest shareholders has a direct voice in governance — a feature relevant to anyone assessing long-term ownership stability.

04

Positive signal

£3.81 of cash for every £1 of reported profit. Earnings are not an accounting story.

05

What to watch

Free cash flow jumped 25% to £1.6bn — a strong result. A big jump in cash generation means BT has more money to pay down debt, fund dividends, and keep investing in its fibre rollout — very positive for anyone owed money by the company.

06

What to watch

Segmental revenue and profit detail not in provided pages. Without the actual segment numbers, we cannot confirm how revenue and profit are split between Consumer, Business, and Openreach, so investors cannot assess which part of BT is growing or shrinking.

09 · Verification

How we know

100 filings · 14 directors · 237 pages

What we read

Companies House filings

Total filings 100 2024 → 2026
Accounts filings 2 audited financial statements
Officer events 8 appointments + terminations
Capital events 81 share allotments + buybacks

Who we cross-checked

UK director appointment network

Directors verified 14 incl. 1 corporate officer
Records cross-referenced 27.8m UK appointments dataset
Avg failure rate 1.3% across prior appointments
Phoenix scan 1 directors flagged

Screening status

Independent checks completed

No critical risk flagsNo kill switches fired Sanctions check · ClearFCDO sanctions screen Politically-exposed persons · None foundPEP screen · 0 hits Status · Active

Steps we ran

How the report was assembled

Pages read 237 PDF pages analysed
Steps run 1 0 failed · 1 succeeded
AI checks 3 independent reviews
Years analysed 2 audited filings trended

Each step in detail

Processing filing Processing filing Processing filing Capital structure review

Limits and caveats

What this report doesn't claim

01

Peer benchmarks

No sector-cohort comparison was generated for this filing — the benchmarking pipeline either skipped this SIC code or this report predates that block.

02

Persons with significant control

No PSCs are recorded against this entity — typical for listed PLCs (widely held by institutional investors) and for dormant / micro-entity filings.

03

Principal risks register

The filed accounts did not surface a structured principal-risks register, or one was not extracted by the parser. Small / micro-entity filings are not required to disclose this.

04

Year-on-year trend

Fewer than three years of accounts are available for trend analysis. Patterns in the data should be read with that range in mind.

Plain-English glossary · 10 terms
Net Assets
What the company is worth on paper — total assets minus everything it owes.
In this filing: BT's net assets grew to £12.91bn, but most of that value sits in intangibles like goodwill and licences, not cash.
Current Liabilities
Bills the company must pay within the next 12 months.
In this filing: BT has £10.3bn due within a year — far more than its £216m cash, so it relies on rolling credit facilities to manage this.
Gross Profit
What's left from sales after paying the direct cost of delivering the service or product.
In this filing: BT's gross profit rose to £3.26bn even as revenue fell, meaning it's cutting costs faster than it's losing income.
Profit Before Tax (PBT)
The company's profit after all running costs but before paying corporation tax.
In this filing: BT made £2.32bn PBT in FY2025 — a small improvement on last year despite lower sales.
Long-Term Liabilities
Debts and obligations due in more than 12 months — things like bonds and pension commitments.
In this filing: BT still carries £27.8bn of long-term liabilities, though this fell by £1.6bn this year.
Cash Conversion
How much of the reported profit actually turns into real cash in the bank.
In this filing: BT converts at 381% — meaning it generates far more operating cash than its headline profit suggests, often because of non-cash charges like depreciation on its network.
Debtor Days
On average, how many days it takes customers to pay their invoices.
In this filing: BT's customers take 67 days to pay — typical for large telecoms contracts with corporate and government clients.
Asset Fragility
How much of a company's assets are 'soft' — things like brand value, leases, or goodwill that can't easily be sold for cash.
In this filing: At 2,881% of total assets being intangible or lease-based, BT's balance sheet would look very different in a forced sale — the network and licences are valuable as a going concern, much less so otherwise.
Right-of-Use (ROU) Assets / Lease Liabilities
Under modern accounting rules, long-term leases are shown on the balance sheet as both an asset (the right to use something) and a liability (the obligation to pay rent).
In this filing: BT's lease obligations represent 8.7% of total visible liabilities — meaningful but not dominant compared to its bond and pension-related debt.
Working Capital Gap
The difference in timing between when a company pays its suppliers and when it collects from its customers — a gap that needs to be funded.
In this filing: BT has a 194-day gap, requiring an estimated £10.8bn to bridge — this is partly structural in how large telecoms billing and procurement cycles work.